Dubai firm contests new tender rules for duty-free shops

Travellers arrive at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport in Nairobi last month. A row over tendering for duty-free shops is now at the High Court. PHOTO | FILE

What you need to know:

  • Suzan General has urged the High Court to quash the Kenya Airports Authority’s decision in June this year to float the duty-free shops contract afresh.
  • It accuses KAA of presenting tender documents with the same technical requirements as those from last year’s exercise, which failed nine other firms in the evaluation process.
  • The duty free shops are expected to inject at least $2 million (Sh172 million) into the economy every year.

A Dubai-based trading firm has gone to court to challenge the decision of the airports watchdog to re-tender for the development and maintenance of duty-free shops at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport.

Suzan General has urged the High Court to quash the Kenya Airports Authority’s decision in June this year to float the duty-free shops contract afresh.

It accuses KAA of presenting tender documents with the same technical requirements as those from last year’s exercise, which failed nine other firms in the evaluation process.

“They all bear the same requirements as the original document, which the board had asked KAA to enlarge so as to make the tender eligibility and evaluation more inclusive. It is clear KAA did not make any effort to comply in this regard,” Suzan General said.

KAA first advertised for the contract in November last year, but the process was declared null and void by the Public Procurement Oversight Authority (PPOA) which found that the tendering was marred with irregularities.

The airports watchdog had declared Swiss firm Nuance AG the winners of the botched process before PPOA cancelled the process.

Suzan General has maintained that KAA failed to comply with the directions of the procurement watchdog to make the tender more inclusive to all bidders, which strips it of the right to re-tender the development and maintenance of the duty free shops.

Arif Hafiz, the trading firm’s general manager, maintains that KAA should be barred from re-tendering until it has complied with the said directions.

Mr Hafiz also said in documents that his firm asked the KAA to extend the tender application deadline for purposes of compliance with the board’s mandatory directions, but the latter declined and went ahead with the process.

The Dubai-based firm has also accused the KAA of laxity in verifying the credentials of the firms that submitted their bids, arguing that some of the applicants did not meet the requirements set out in the tender documents.

“Credentials of all bidders were not verified, specifically relating to a minimum of three years operating as a duty-free shops retailer and a master concessionaire contract in at least three airports each with an annual traffic of not less than seven million passengers,” said Daniel Gacugia, Suzan General’s lawyer.

The firm also wants KAA to compensate all bidders for the money they have spent in putting in their bids, alongside the costs it will spend in the duration of the suit it has lodged.

Justice Mumbi Ngugi directed that Suzan General serve KAA with the suit immediately so as to give it time to respond before she gives further direction on the matter on September 17.

The opportunity to manage the duty free shops at JKIA fell vacant after billionaire tycoon Kamlesh Pattni gave up his tenancy at the airport, and withdrew court cases he had filed against KAA for demolishing his shops.

The duty free shops are expected to inject at least $2 million (Sh172 million) into the economy every year.

PAYE Tax Calculator

Note: The results are not exact but very close to the actual.