Opinion and Analysis

New agriculture laws may hurt economic growth, leave millions of Kenyans jobless

Share Bookmark Print Rating
Jamila Patunoi, a farmer in Laikipia North, tends her crops last month. FILE

Jamila Patunoi, a farmer in Laikipia North, tends her crops last month. Governors have expressed concerns over new agriculture laws. They say that the new Acts passed last year will result in double regulation and taxation. FILE 

By Nderitu Gachagua

Posted  Wednesday, January 15  2014 at  18:24

In Summary

  • Governors say legislation will hit farmers and players in the sector if effected.

It is almost a year since the Tenth Parliament passed the Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority (AFFA) Act 2013, the Crops Act 2013 and the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Act 2013.

The three pieces of legislation were crafted against the backdrop of the proposal by the Kenya Vision 2030 Medium Term Plan of “consolidating agricultural policy reform legislation” and the Agriculture Sector Development Strategy.

Since then, debate has been rife over the implications of implementing the three new laws, given that they seek to introduce radical changes in the manner in which the agricultural sector will be managed going forward.

The Council of Governors has keenly followed the public debate on these laws. The council has also studied proposals by the Agriculture Cabinet Secretary Felix Kosgey to amend the three laws contained in the Statute Law Miscellaneous Amendment Bill No. 2 of 2013 published on October 30, 2013, and tabled before Parliament on November 13 for its First Reading.

Although the amendment Bill has since lapsed, the proposed amendments never addressed the issues of immediate concern to the Council of Governors in particular and the agricultural sector in general.

We would like to re-emphasise that the AFFA Act, if implemented in its current structure, is not viable and is indeed unconstitutional.

It is instructive to note that agriculture is the function number one devolved to counties, according to the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution of Kenya.

However, the Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority, as currently constituted, will handle roles and functions that have already been delegated to county governments.

This will generate conflict between the National Government and the 47 counties across all crop sub-sectors. While the AFFA Act ostensibly seeks to create a leaner structure for the agricultural sector, it – in fact – does the opposite by duplicating agricultural functions across the national and county levels.

This is contravention to Article 174 of the Constitution, which clearly states the objects of devolution which include, giving powers of self-governance to the people as well recognising the rights of communities to manage their own affairs and to further their development.

On matters of agriculture, the national government has the functions of formulating of agricultural and veterinary policy, foreign policy, international trade and disaster management while counties take up the day-to-day agricultural services relating to crop and animal husbandry, plant and animal disease control as well trade regulation.

But in sharp contrast to that commitment, the national government — through the AFFA Act and the Crops Act — will be charged with the responsibility of overseeing among other things, the provision of farm inputs and agricultural extension services hand in hand with counties which are also expected to deliver the same services as stipulated by the Kenya Gazette supplement number 116 issued on August 9, 2013.

A reading of Section 39 of the Crops Act exposes the looming conflict even more clearly as it expressly states that the Crops Act shall supersede any law a county government may enact concerning the development, management, marketing or regulation of a scheduled crop.

The implication of such laws will, first and foremost, be the recentralisation to the national government of power and decision making in agricultural matters that affect communities which is against the letter and spirit of the Constitution.

Secondly, there will be unnecessary legislative and service-delivery conflicts between national government (represented by AFFA) and county governments which will — in turn — delay the realisation of devolution and its accruing benefits to people at the grassroots level.

1 | 2 Next Page »