Victory for EACC as ex-KPA boss James Mulewa ordered to pay State Sh74.6m

Former Kenya Ports Authority managing director James Mulewa (left) in a Mombasa court. FILE PHOTO | NMG

What you need to know:

  • EACC had argued that upon completion of its investigations, it found that Mr Mulewa had unexplained assets.
  • It consequently issued as statutory notice requiring him to explain how he acquired the assets.
  • EACC further argued that the response by Mr Mulewa was not satisfactory

The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has scored a major victory in its fight against corruption after former Kenya Ports Authority managing director James Mulewa was ordered to pay the government Sh74.6 million for unexplained assets.

Justice Eric Ogola ordered the former MD to pay the government Sh63.6 million being cumulative bank deposits he made between August 31, 2008 and May 20, 2010.

The judge further directed Mr Mulewa to pay the government Sh11 million being the value of a vacant parcel of land in Nyali, Mombasa and a four-bedroom maissonette at Bandari villas.

“Being that these assets (the plot and maisonette) are unexplained, the value should be paid to the Government of Kenya as required by Section 55 (6) of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act,” said Justice Ogola.

Legitimate income

The judge noted that it was evident that Mr Mulewa was afforded a reasonable opportunity to explain the disproportion between the (suit) assets and his legitimate sources of income as required by Section 55(b) of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act.

Through lawyer Philip Kagucia, the EACC argued that upon completion of its investigations, it found that Mr Mulewa had unexplained assets and consequently issued as statutory notice requiring him to explain how he acquired the assets.

EACC further argued that the response by Mr Mulewa was not satisfactory hence it instituted the proceedings.

Mr Kagucia told the court that EACC had established that Mr Mulewa had unexplained assets and there was no evidence in court that they were not acquired through corruption.

He further told the court that Mr Mulewa had denied allegations against him but had not provided any evidence to support his claim that he legitimately acquired the assets.

Sh1.05m a month

EACC had told the court that Mr Mulewa, during the period of August 5, 2008 and May 20, 2010 when he was the managing director, used to earn Sh1,050,000 per month.

The anti-graft agency had also claimed that during the period, Mr Mulewa acquired the properties in his name and that of his son.

Mr Kagucia told the court that it was irrelevant that Mr Mulewa was acquitted of corruption charges.

He argued that the acquittal of Mr Mulewa in the criminal case strengthened the need for civil forfeiture.

“There may not have been enough evidence to convict on a criminal case, it does not mean you don’t have to seek civil forfeiture,” said Mr Kagucia.

Mr Mulewa had refuted claims by the EACC and suggested that even a "mere" KPA employee can be wealthy.

The former MD did not dispute that he owned various bank accounts but argued that some of them were operated for his own use while others for the benefit of others in his capacity as the administrator of his father’s estate.

Real estate business

Mr Mulewa also claimed that during the period in question, besided being a KPA employee, he was involved in real estate business where he acquired some of the properties from as early as 1984.

The former MD also told the court that his wife operates several business stalls at Kongowea market and a guest house and that he is the beneficiary of his late father’s estate, which includes a ranch.

He also claimed that the daily deposits made to his accounts were proceeds from the sale of cattle at his family ranch in Kilifi County.

Through lawyer Ernest Mokaya, the former MD had told the court that he worked for KPA since 1981 and that nothing has been questioned about his investment abilities.

Mr Mokaya had argued that the continued reference of a corruption against Mr Mulewa was wrong.

“Any reference of him as being corrupt is uncalled for, in the absence of an appeal (of a decision acquitting him) any other reference as corrupt is uncalled for,” Mr Mokaya told Justice Ogola.

PAYE Tax Calculator

Note: The results are not exact but very close to the actual.