advertisement
Letters

LETTERS: Land ministry must protect minority rights

 Land Act
The Community Land Act does exist. FILE PHOTO | NMG 

As it is, land rights have been at the heart of Kenya’s inflamed degree of resource and ethnic conflict, which is why we have poured huge legislative effort into resolving our historical land ‘wrongs’.

Yet the Ministry of Land seems to have failed to grasp its central role in now applying our new laws to create a fairer, stronger and more united nation.

Following the promulgation of the Constitution in 2010, we created a new land law, and established an adjudication procedure for disputed lands. We then created a separate law for community land, and there was a reason: for most community land had no registered owner - it had been lived on by our pastoral communities, owned by no other, but never registered.

So, by 2016, we had created the Community Land Act to put in place the systems and procedures to register community land to its rightful owners, the local communities.

It took until 2018 to promulgate the regulations to operationalise the law. And then began the process of mapping our unregistered community land, and registering it. This, by law, was to have involved two processes.

advertisement

From September 2018 and for one year the Ministry of Land was charged with educating the public on the new law and raising public awareness. It never did.

At the same time, county governments had until April 2019 to produce an inventory of all their community lands. Not all of the 24 counties with community land met that deadline, but some of them did, and Isiolo was one of them.

The Ministry of Lands, however, then did not do its part, once again. By the end of August, last year, the ministry was supposed to have processed the inventories and begun the registration process for the identified community lands.

Instead, the Cabinet Secretary for Land and Physical Planning took a very different path and on 3rd September last year issued Legal Notice 150 moving Isiolo’s community lands out of the process defined by the Community Land Act, and over into the Lands Adjudication Act process instead.

In a single step, the Community Land Act, which the ministry had never educated anyone on, was effectively nulled.

In fact, the breach of law was greater still. The ministry announced that large tracts of the Isiolo community land would not be adjudicated at all, and instead simply claimed them for the government, without compensation, and without any process whatsoever. We call that land grabbing.

The land did not belong to the government, not to the army for a base, and not to any other arm of government, without having gone through a normal process of government acquisition and compensation to the actual land owners – being the pastoral communities.

The county government supported the abandonment of the community lands process. Yet it had proceeded to the last stage of registration.

But maybe it was just too tempting to take the land from pastoralists without compensation, versus stealing land tracts elsewhere where compensation would be obligatory. However, when it gets to the point - after violence, deaths, displacement, years of trauma - that our lands ministry has no qualms whatsoever in grabbing untitled land without compensation, one has to question what it actually takes to get a lands ministry that observes and applies the land laws.

Certainly, it’s a depressing reflection of our ethical foundation when our ministry cannot grasp the rationale, basis or legality of the Community Land Act 2016, but that it does not even recognise its application or existence at all is beyond unethical: it strikes at the heart of our constitution and at our capacity and integrity as a government and as a nation state.

The Community Land Act does exist, and no reason or exception was ever made in applying it.

And the lands ministry should be held accountable. Isiolo’s community land registration needs to proceed as defined in law, with the government having the honour and respect for community rights to compensate the community for any land it would like to own.

We do not live in a new republic where we pick and choose the laws we want to apply as cabinet secretaries or as parliamentarians. We live in a republic that is bound by the laws it makes, and bound to apply them.

Abshiro Halake, Nominated Senator

advertisement