Columnists

Hunger song: Time leaders changed the hymnbook

col1-pic

Summary

  • Using food as a political tool especially around election year needs urgent attention.
  • The budgetary allocation to agricultural programmes, besides being synonymous with a drop of water in the desert, exposes misplaced priorities by decision-makers.
  • Most smallholder farmers who need relief food lost their harvest because of overreliance on maize.

For more than 50 years, Kenya has experienced systemic hunger. It has become the norm. In one of his speeches, the founding father of our nation, Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, committed to fighting hunger, ignorance, and disease.

These are the three fundamental rights- healthcare, education and food. However, almost six decades since Kenya attained independence, our rights, remain a mirage.

Food availability and affordability is not only a struggle for the rural poor as we might assume. The increased mobility of people and population density means it has crept into cities and sprawls through suburbs. For example, the population of Nairobi grows by more than four percent annually.

It is estimated to reach more than five million people in 2025. In Nairobi only one household in five is food-secure, and nearly half of all households are categorized as "food-insecure with both adult and child hunger."

In 2010, Kenya took a bold step by promulgating what is believed to be a progressive constitution not only on the continent but globally. Indeed, Article 43 (1) (c) of the Constitution of Kenya, on the Social and Economic Rights states that 'every person has a right to be free from hunger, and to have adequate food of acceptable quality’ thus providing for a human rights-based approach to food security in Kenya.

Despite this constitutional provision being viewed as a milestone towards realising the right to food more than 12 million people are food insecure. The stark statistics represent Kenyans sleeping on empty stomachs despite promises made by successive regimes.

Using food as a political tool, especially around election year, and the lack of meaningful political commitment, which would be attested to by the implementation of laws and policies, needs urgent attention.

A society is judged by the way it treats its most vulnerable members. In the past two months, images of stunted and malnourished children have been commonplace in our media channels. In Kenya, one out of five children is stunted.

According to WHO, the consequences of stunting include poor cognition and educational performance, low adult wages, lost productivity, and excessive weight gain later in childhood, leading to increased risk of nutrition-related chronic diseases in adult life.

Besides stunted growth, mental illness that has been on the increase in Kenya and perhaps, lack of food and poor nutrition could be the reason. According to a recent study titled - the association between food insecurity and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, food insecurity is associated with a 257% higher risk of anxiety and a 253% higher risk of depression.

Such healthcare challenges gobbling huge budgets at micro and macro levels could be averted if resources allocated to agriculture could be utilised sustainably. For instance, the agriculture and health sectors, which are closely interlinked, are both devolved.

However, the just-released County Governments Budget Implementation Review Report (CBIRR) for the Financial Year (FY) 2020/21, by the Office of the Controller of Budget (OCoB), covering July 2020 to June 2021, paints a gloomy picture.

According to the report, there was high expenditure on personnel emoluments, which translated to 44.2 per cent of the total spending and low spending on the development budget, which translated to an absorption rate of 62.1 per cent of the cumulative annual development budget.

The stark reality is county governments paid themselves almost 50 percent of the total budget they received from the taxpayers and "forgot" to implement the development plan leading to the low absorption rate of the development budget.

Perhaps, if the development budget were utilised 100 percent, we would not be reading news of Kenyans dying of hunger due to lack of rainfall. With erratic rains becoming the norm, county governments should have incorporated sustainable measures to cushion citizens in rural and urban areas from hunger pangs.

This is the objective of the County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP), developed every five years and taxpayers who fund that plan expect the executives to safeguard their interests, such as the right to adequate food at all times.

The CIDP, which ideally is a people-driven plan, should contain development priorities that benefit citizens, such as building water pans, access roads, and not being leveraged as a public policy tool for tenderpreneurs who are after rent-seeking.

Besides underutilisation of the development budget, decision-makers at the National and County levels need to realise that allocating four percent of the overall budget to agriculture and, on average local governments spending six percent on this crucial sector is equivalent to treating the hunger symptoms.

Yet, it has become a chronic illness in the country. Indeed, the budgetary allocation to agricultural programmes, besides being synonymous with a drop of water in the desert, exposes misplaced priorities by decision-makers who have repeatedly failed to allocate budgets to projects that will achieve food security.

For instance, most smallholder farmers who need relief food lost their harvest because of overreliance on maize. Such a simple process like ensuring each county ward has an extension officer who understands the ecological and social needs of the people could go a long way in solving the hunger puzzle.

The extension service officers could then equip the smallholder farmer with agroecological knowledge such as crop diversity, rainwater harvesting, and mulching, hence, averting post-harvest losses, poor nutrition, and overreliance on agro-industry for farm inputs, among other aspects of sustainable farming.

Indeed, if the government dedicated adequate resources for agroecological projects and citizens were more engaged in governance such as public participation, which places powers on the people, Kenya would attain national food security.

It is distasteful for the government, to keep allocating funds to programmes and projects that are not yielding nutritious meals for Kenyans.