A wonderful effort at more openness on national security issues was nearly derailed by misinterpretation of the CDF’s obvious point that political processes should adhere to the Constitution. I attended the one of a kind public lecture.
Key speakers acknowledged that the new openness would likely face opposition. But they made a strong case that given the rapidly evolving nature of national security risks, a new paradigm is necessary. The discourse was an eye opener, so here is my take.
